전체메뉴
Search
Article Search

JoP

Research Article

Split Viewer

Related articles in JAMS

More Related Articles

Article

Research Article

J Acupunct Meridian Stud 2023; 16(4): 127-132

Published online August 31, 2023 https://doi.org/10.51507/j.jams.2023.16.4.127

Copyright © Medical Association of Pharmacopuncture Institute.

Effect of Acupressure on Pain during Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Injection in Children Aged 5-10 Years Old - An Experimental Study

Ayushi Shashikant Gurharikar , Devendra Nagpal *, Prabhat Singh Yadav , Purva Chaudhari , Kavita Hotwani , Gagandeep Lamba

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, VSPM’S Dental College and Research Centre, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence to:Devendra Nagpal
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, VSPM’s Dental College and Research Center, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
E-mail drdevendranagpal@vspmdcrc.edu.in

Received: June 7, 2022; Revised: December 2, 2022; Accepted: June 13, 2023

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background: Acupressure, which is related to acupuncture, is a noninvasive therapy suitable for use in children. However, data examining acupressure’s effects on the pain of local anesthetic injection in children are sparse.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate acupressure’s effects on the pain of local anesthetic injection in children.
Methods: This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical study included 37 5- to 10-year-olds who had an inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) for a mandibular extraction and were randomized to one of two groups: acupressure (study group) or non-acupressure (control group). The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (WBFPS) and the Sound, Eye, Motor (SEM) scale were utilized for subjective and objective pain assessment during injection.
Results: The objective and subjective assessment of pain during injection significantly differed between the groups, with the acupressure group displaying lower scores.
Conclusion: Acupressure at the extra one point (EX-HN1) reduced pain during IANB injection in 5- to 10-year-olds and can be used as an adjunct to conventional measures like topical anesthesia to reduce pain.

Keywords: Acupressure, EX-HN1, IANB, Pain on injection, Pain assessment scale, Physiologic pain assessment

Trial Registration: Clinical Trials Registry- India (CTRI) by ICMR National Institution of Medical Registry. Registration No. CTRI/2021/12/038599.

INTRODUCTION

In pediatric dentistry, it is essential to reduce the pain, anxiety, and fear induced by local anesthetic (LA) injection so that the patient cooperates during dental treatment. According to the literature, about 14% of 4- to 11-year-olds are anxious while visiting a dental clinic, and injections are their biggest fear [1]. Inadequate pain management measures for local anesthesia may result in a negative dental experience, which may lead to dental fear and anxiety, and to the future avoidance of dental treatment [2].

There are several methods for reducing the pain of local anesthetic injections, such as applying topical anesthetics (e.g., benzocaine) [3], warming the local anesthetic solution [4], buffering the local anesthetic [5], and adjusting the rate of infiltration [6]. Furthermore, using a mechanical delivery device, vibrating nearby tissue while administering the injection, and exerting pressure on the injection site have also been explored to lessen the pain of local anesthetic injection [7,8].

Acupuncture is an ancient East Asian/Chinese technique that has been used for more than 2,000 years to alleviate pain. According to traditional Chinese theory, this technique alters the flow of Qi (vital energy of the body) and Xue (blood), and it can be used therapeutically for many conditions. Modern scientific investigation has demonstrated that acupuncture works by stimulating the neurological system, altering the way it processes pain signals and releasing natural painkillers, such as serotonin and endorphins, into the central nervous system (CNS) [9].

As per a systematic review, acupuncture is efficacious for many types of anxiety, but a significant drawback is the potential for bacterial infection due to reusable needles [10]. Acupressure evolved to overcome this problem. This noninvasive form of acupuncture produces the same results as acupuncture and is more suitable for children. It manually stimulates acupoints using a variety of tools, such as derma rollers, magnetic point inducers, or seeds of Vaccaria [11].

Acupressure has been shown to help with anxiety, nausea and vomiting during pregnancy, spinal anesthesia, laparoscopic procedures, and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders [12], and has been suggested as a method of reducing dental anxiety in children undergoing scaling and other restorative procedures [11].

Data analyzing the effect of acupressure on the pain of local anesthetic injection in children undergoing dental procedures are sparse. Hence, the purpose of this study was to evaluate acupressure’s effect on pain during inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) injection in children ages 5 to 10 years old.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Study design and setting

This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical study was conducted in the Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry after approval was obtained from the institute’s ethics committee (IEC/VSPM DCRC/10/2019), as well as signed informed consent from the parents and assent from the children for treatment between December 2021 and February 2022. This permission included clearance for the Sound, Eye, Motor (SEM) assessment video record of the patient observation. Study participants were assured that their personal information would be kept private and they could withdraw from the study at any time without affecting their care and treatment.

2. Sample size calculation

A sample size of 32 children per group was required to achieve 80% power and an alpha error of 5%. In consideration of a possible dropout rate of 10%, 37 children were included in each group.

3. Inclusion/exclusion criteria

The following inclusion criteria were used to select study participants: age between 5 and 10 years old, an indication for at least one clinical session of extraction requiring IANB, a Frankl’s behavior rating of 3 or 4 (positive or definitely positive), and the absence of physical and mental health conditions.

Simple randomization was accomplished with random allocation software. The software generated unique identification codes for each child, which were placed in opaque, numbered, and sealed envelopes for concealment. Children were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the study (with acupressure) or control (without acupressure) group. Investigator 1 enrolled the children and sealed the envelopes for allocation and randomization. The operator and children were blinded to the intervention. The trial was complete after all children had undergone treatment as part of their allocated group.

4. Intervention

The chosen anxiolytic acupoint was EX-HN1, also known as the Yin Tang point, located midway between the medial ends of the two brows and shown to induce sedation and alter sympathetic-parasympathetic nerve harmony. In Chinese tradition, the application of acupressure on EX-HN1 is done to relieve stress [13].

Children randomized to the study group (acupressure intervention group) were allowed to sit and relax in a quiet environment. Investigator one (I1), who was trained at a local acupressure clinic, placed acupressure beads to apply acupressure at EX-HN1. The acupressure beads were made with self-adhesive tape that generated standardized pressure; neither supplemental pressure nor manipulation was used after the bead was secured. Beads were secured at EX-HN1 until the extraction took place. All IANB injections were administered by the same operator (I2) using the conventional technique, as described in the Handbook of Local Anesthesia. During the administration, a distraction technique was employed, with patients asked to imagine pictures of their favorite cartoon characters. After the injection, the subjective symptoms and objective signs of anesthesia were recorded [14].

Children randomized to the control group underwent the same procedure, but self-adhesive tape was applied without the bead. For the SEM assessment, video was recorded from the time the child sat in the dental chair until objective signs of local anesthesia started to appear. None of the children from either group reported adverse effects (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. CONSORT table - randomisation of sample. Allocation to respective group. n = number.

5. Outcome measurement tools

Pain during injection of the LA solution was subjectively assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (WBFPS) immediately following IANB administration [15].

Pain on injection was objectively assessed using the Sound, Eye, Motor scale [15].

A pulse oximeter was used to measure physiological parameters like pulse rate (PR) measured in Beats per minutes & oxygen saturation (SpO2) expressed as percentage(%) at baseline as well as during and after LA administration between the group.

6. Statistical analysis

IBM SPSS Version 21 was used for statistical analysis. The confidence interval was kept at 95% for the assessment of all data, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. For categorical data, frequency analysis (number and percentage) was performed using chi-square tests, and descriptive statistics were employed for continuous data. Unpaired t-tests were used to compare continuous variables such as age, weight, Frankl score, WBFPS, and SEM score between the two groups. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to compare variables at different intervals, such as the mean SpO2 & pulse rate at three different intervals.

RESULTS

In each group, five children were excluded from the study because they became uncooperative during the LA procedure, leaving a total of 64 patients in the final sample—32 patients in each group. The mean age was 8.63 ± 1.27 in the study group and 8.36 ± 1.56 in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with respect to age, gender, or Frankl rating scale (Table 1).

Table 1

Distribution of children according to age, Frankl rating scale and gender in between study and control group.

Demographic detailsGroupsMeanStd. deviationp-value
AgeStudy (with acupressure)8.61.270.44
Control group (without acupressure)8.31.56
Frankl rating scoreStudyScore 3 - (15)1.270.44
Score 4 - (14)
ControlScore 3 - (17)
Score 4 - (18)
GenderStudyMale-12-0.08
Female-20
ControlMale-17-
Female-15


The mean WBFPS and SEM scores were 2.00 ± 1.83 and 1.62 ± 0.65, respectively, for the study group, and 5.12 ± 2.63 and 2.84 ± 0.76, respectively, for the control group. These scores showed statistically significant differences between the two groups in Student’s unpaired t-test (Table 2).

WB-FPRS = wong baker facial pain scale; SEM = sound eye motor scale..

&md=tbl&idx=2' data-target="#file-modal"">Table 2

Comparison of WB-FPRS and SEM in between study and control group.

Pain scalesGroupsMeanStd. deviationp-value
(Subjective) WB-FPRSStudy2.001.83< 0.01
Control5.122.63
(Objective) SEM scaleStudy1.620.65< 0.01
Control2.840.76

WB-FPRS = wong baker facial pain scale; SEM = sound eye motor scale..



Pulse rate and SpO2 showed no statistically significant differences between the acupressure (study group) and non-acupressure (control group) groups at baseline, which suggests that the groups were well matched. During and after LA injection, however, the mean pulse rate and SpO2 of the study and control groups demonstrated statistically significant differences. In the study group, the pulse rate and SpO2 were not affected much during the injection compared with baseline values. However, in the control group (non-acupressure), the pulse rate increased during injection and remained elevated compared with baseline (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Effects of EX-HN3 acupressure on pulse rate and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) in mandibular extraction in children. Note that the changes in pulse rate and SpO2 were significantly reduced in the Study group during and after the local anesthetic injection for the inferior alveolar nerve block. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.

DISCUSSION

Acupressure is a noninvasive form of acupuncture that can be administered by direct finger pressure or the use of a bead or pellet over the targeted points. In the current study, acupressure beads (natural Vaccaria seeds with a piece of adhesive tape, commercially available as AHCS Vaccaria Seed, Hyderabad, Telangana 500027) were used over the selected points for constant pressure application. This method has an advantage over direct finger pressure in children, as it rules out operator differences.

In the current study, the treatment procedure was initiated 15 minutes after acupressure was applied. This approach is in accordance with other studies, which documented a therapeutic effect as early as 15-30 mins after the application of acupressure beads [11]. EX-HN1 was chosen as the point of acupressure application because of its reported ability to reduce anxiety [16]. The most common nerve block technique for mandibular procedures is the conventional IANB, which also is the most painful and causes more discomfort than infiltration, intrafilamentary injection, and mental nerve block [17]. The literature on the effect of acupressure on pain reduction during IANB is extremely limited [17]. To eliminate inter-examiner variability in the current study, all LA administrations were performed by the same operator, while investigator 2 assessed pain perception to avoid bias.

Since pain is extremely difficult to quantify in children, pain on injection was subjectively and objectively assessed by the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale and the Sound, Eye, Motor scale, respectively. The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale was chosen because it has good construct validity and adequate psychometric properties, and it is both simple to use and inexpensive [18]. In a systematic review, Tomlinson et al identified the WBFPS as a scale with extensive psychometric testing that has been used to assess both acute and disease-related pain in children [18].

The mean WBFPS and SEM scores were less in the study group than in the control group, showing statistically significant differences in pain on injection. Kumar et al. (2021) [19] evaluated the effect of acupressure on injection pain and dental anxiety in children using the two anxiolytic acupoints of Yin Tang and HT7. The researchers observed a significant reduction in pain on injection in the acupressure groups during the administration of the IANB, and dental anxiety was significantly lower in the acupressure group [19]. Physiological functions are also measured as part of the objective assessments. An increase in the sympathetic activity of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) is linked to the psychophysiological responses induced by anxiety and pain, and increased blood pressure and pulse rate are caused by changes in the cardiovascular system. A study conducted by Rayen et al. (2006) [20] concluded that pulse rate and blood pressure increase at the same time as a result of stress and anxiety at the dental clinic. A pulse oximeter, which provides a patient’s arterial hemoglobin & oxygenation levels as well as pulse rate, is one of the most sustainable methods for measuring physiologic changes. As a result, it was used in this investigation [21]. The pulse rate was significantly lower in the study group; this response could be attributed to acupressure. Avisa et al. (2018) [11] evaluated acupressure’s effect on dental anxiety using EX-HN1, HT7, and sham acupoints during scaling and restorative procedures in children. They reported a significantly lower pulse rate in the acupressure group compared with the non-acupressure group.

The use of acupressure in pediatric dentistry becomes inevitable given its effective and noninvasive approach. Erappa et al. [22] conducted a comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of hypnosis, acupressure, and audiovisual aids in reducing children’s anxiety during the administration of local anesthesia; all three distraction techniques were effective, the authors concluded. Hypnosis was most promising, followed by audiovisual aids and acupressure.

Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in combination with acupressure was effective in controlling gag reflex in children undergoing impression-making dental procedures compared with acupressure alone [23].

LIMITATIONS

Multiple sittings of acupressure bead application could not be evaluated because the dental procedure studied was completed in a single sitting.

The paucity of literature on acupressure in children makes a comparison of study results difficult.

CONCLUSIONS

Acupressure at the EX-HN1 point reduced pain during inferior alveolar nerve block injection in 5- to 10-year-olds and can be used as an adjunct to conventional measures like topical anesthesia.

LIMITATIONS

Multiple sittings of acupressure bead application could not be evaluated because the dental procedure studied was completed in a single sitting.

The paucity of literature on acupressure in children makes a comparison of study results difficult.

CONCLUSIONS

Acupressure at the EX-HN1 point reduced pain during inferior alveolar nerve block injection in 5- to 10-year-olds and can be used as an adjunct to conventional measures like topical anesthesia.

FUNDING

None.

AUTHORS' CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualisation: Devendra Nagpal; Data curation: Ayushi Shashikant Gurharikar; Formal analysis: Devendra Nagpal; Investigation: Ayushi Shashikant Gurharikar; Methodology: Devendra Nagpal; Supervision: Prabhat Singh Yadav; Gagandeep Lamba; Validation: Purva Chaudhari; Writing - original draft: Ayushi Shashikant Gurharikar; Writing - review & editing: Devendra Nagpal; Kavita Hotwani.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.CONSORT table - randomisation of sample. Allocation to respective group. n = number.
Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies 2023; 16: 127-132https://doi.org/10.51507/j.jams.2023.16.4.127

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Effects of EX-HN3 acupressure on pulse rate and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) in mandibular extraction in children. Note that the changes in pulse rate and SpO2 were significantly reduced in the Study group during and after the local anesthetic injection for the inferior alveolar nerve block. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Journal of Acupuncture and Meridian Studies 2023; 16: 127-132https://doi.org/10.51507/j.jams.2023.16.4.127

Table 1 . Distribution of children according to age, Frankl rating scale and gender in between study and control group.

Demographic detailsGroupsMeanStd. deviationp-value
AgeStudy (with acupressure)8.61.270.44
Control group (without acupressure)8.31.56
Frankl rating scoreStudyScore 3 - (15)1.270.44
Score 4 - (14)
ControlScore 3 - (17)
Score 4 - (18)
GenderStudyMale-12-0.08
Female-20
ControlMale-17-
Female-15

Table 2 . Comparison of WB-FPRS and SEM in between study and control group.

Pain scalesGroupsMeanStd. deviationp-value
(Subjective) WB-FPRSStudy2.001.83< 0.01
Control5.122.63
(Objective) SEM scaleStudy1.620.65< 0.01
Control2.840.76

WB-FPRS = wong baker facial pain scale; SEM = sound eye motor scale..


References

  1. Singh H, Rehman R, Kadtane S, Dalai DR, Jain CD. Techniques for the behaviors management in pediatric dentistry. Int J Sci Stud 2014;2:269-72.
  2. O'Brien L, Taddio A, Lyszkiewicz DA, Koren G. A critical review of the topical local anesthetic amethocaine (Ametop) for pediatric pain. Paediatr Drugs 2005;7:41-54.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Bartfield JM, Crisafulli KM, Raccio-Robak N, Salluzzo RF. The effects of warming and buffering on pain of infiltration of lidocaine. Acad Emerg Med 1995;2:254-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Tirupathi SP, Rajasekhar S. Effect of warming local anesthesia solutions before intraoral administration in dentistry: a systematic review. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2020;20:187-94.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  5. Courtney DJ, Agrawal S, Revington PJ. Local anaesthesia: to warm or alter the pH? A survey of current practice. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1999;44:167-71.
  6. Younis I, Bhutiani RP. Taking the 'ouch' out - effect of buffering commercial xylocaine on infiltration and procedure pain - a prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2004;86:213-7.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  7. Friedman MJ, Hochman MN. The AMSA injection: a new concept for local anesthesia of maxillary teeth using a computer-controlled injection system. Quintessence Int 1998;29:297-303.
    Pubmed
  8. Naik PN, Kiran RA, Yalamanchal S, Kumar VA, Goli S, Vashist N. Acupuncture: an alternative therapy in dentistry and its possible applications. Med Acupunct 2014;26:308-14.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Bussell J. Acupuncture and anxiety 2013: the year in (literature) review. OA Altern Med 2014;2:3. Acupuncture and anxiety 2013::the.
  10. Errington-Evans N. Acupuncture for anxiety. CNS Neurosci Ther 2012;18:277-84.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Avisa P, Kamatham R, Vanjari K, Nuvvula S. Effectiveness of acupressure on dental anxiety in children. Pediatr Dent 2018;40:177-83.
    Pubmed
  12. Lin WC, Yeh CH, Chien LC, Morone NE, Glick RM, Albers KM. The anti-inflammatory actions of auricular point acupressure for chronic low back pain. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015;2015:103570. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/103570.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  13. Stux G, Pomeranz B. Basics of Acupuncture. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991.
    CrossRef
  14. Malamed SF. Handbook of Local Anesthesia. 6th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier/Mosby, 2013.
    CrossRef
  15. Wong DL, Baker CM. Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. Pediatr Nurs 1988;14:9-17.
    Pubmed
  16. Armfield JM, Heaton LJ. Management of fear and anxiety in the dental clinic: a review. Aust Dent J 2013;58:390-407; quiz 531.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Kaufman E, Epstein JB, Naveh E, Gorsky M, Gross A, Cohen G. A survey of pain, pressure, and discomfort induced by commonly used oral local anesthesia injections. Anesth Prog 2005;52:122-7.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  18. Tomlinson D, von Baeyer CL, Stinson JN, Sung L. A systematic review of faces scales for the self-report of pain intensity in children. Pediatrics 2010;126:e1168-98.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Kumar S, Bhattad D, Sajjanar A, Wasnik M, Rojekar N, Shukla H, et al. Effect of acupressure to reduce the dental anxiety in 8-12 year children: randomized control trial. Ann Romanian Soc Cell Biol 2021;25:3141-9.
  20. Rayen R, Muthu MS, Chandrasekhar Rao R, Sivakumar N. Evaluation of physiological and behavioral measures in relation to dental anxiety during sequential dental visits in children. Indian J Dent Res 2006;17:27-34.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. van Gastel M, Stuijk S, de Haan G. New principle for measuring arterial blood oxygenation, enabling motion-robust remote monitoring. Sci Rep 2016;6:38609.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  22. Erappa U, Konde S, Agarwal M, Peethambar P, Devi V, Ghosh S. Comparative evaluation of efficacy of hypnosis, acupressure and audiovisual aids in reducing the anxiety of children during administration of local anesthesia. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14(Suppl 2):S186-92.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  23. Koticha P, Katge F, Chimata V, Poojari M, Shetty S. The effect of low level laser therapy and acupressure in controlling gag reflex in children undergoing dental procedures. Int J Sci Healthc Res 2021;6:1-8. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijshr.20210401.
    CrossRef